Home / Solutions / Integrations & migration

Works with what you have. Replaces only what’s earned it.

Every method needs one promise it can't break. Ours is this: we connect to the AMS, rater, and carrier workflows you already run before we replace anything, and when data does move, it moves behind a written validation report, with your renewals untouched until every check passes.

Start a 30-day trial → Get the MGA Systems Assessment

Inventory first · connect before replace · validation before cut-over

Our integration approach

Inventory first. Then we connect.

Phasing exists because you cannot validate what you cannot see. The Assessment starts by listing every system, feed, and spreadsheet you actually run, including the ones nobody admits to. Integration is scoped against that list, not against an idealized diagram of how your stack is supposed to work.

The inventory comes first

Before anything is designed, we map the real stack: your AMS, your rater, the carrier portals, the reporting spreadsheets, and the email threads doing the work in between. If it moves premium or policy data, it goes on the list.

We connect to what you run

Each connection is scoped against your actual systems and the workflows your carriers depend on. The portal quotes against your rating. The workflow reads and writes the records your team already trusts. Nothing gets routed around.

No logo wall

We won't show you a grid of vendor logos pretending we've integrated with everything. You get the true list for your stack (what connects, how deep, and what doesn't) published in your Assessment, in writing.

What the Assessment covers →

THE LANES WE SCOPE

Five kinds of connection cover almost every stack we assess. Which of them you need, and how deep each one goes, is answered in your Assessment, for your systems, by name.

Agency management systemRead and write the policy record your team already trusts

RatingQuote against your rating, not a copy of it

Carrier reportingBordereaux in the format each carrier agreement requires

Documents and emailSubmissions and attachments captured where they arrive

Accounting and premiumPremium and commission moved once, reconciled against source

STAYS

What does not move

Your agency management system, unless a phase earns its replacement
Your rating, your carrier relationships and your carrier agreements
Your accounting system and your general ledger
Your renewals, until validation passes

WE BUILD

What gets built around it

The broker portal your producers quote in
The submission-to-issuance workflow that removes the re-keying
Carrier reporting generated from the record instead of assembled by hand
AI Operational Workforce intake and preparation, with a person approving

This is the stays-versus-builds answer. For the phase-by-phase sequence, the longer treatment is in Do you have to replace your AMS? Which side of this ledger each of your systems falls on is decided in the Assessment, not here.

Migration methodology

Migration behind a gate, not over a weekend.

Data moves in parallel while your current system stays live. Every migrated record is reconciled against its source, and the results go into a written validation report before anything depends on the new system.

Parallel run, the new system fills while the old one keeps doing its job. No date where everything must work at once.
Reconciliation against source, record counts, premium totals, and open submissions checked against what your current system says, not against what the migration script hoped.
A written validation report, yours to keep either way, whether or not the cut-over ever happens on our watch.

The rule: renewals are never cut over until validation passes. If a check fails, we fix it and re-run the check. Your renewals wait for the report, never the other way around.

Illustrative interface, sample data

Policy records, 1,214 of 1,214 match sourceValidated

Premium totals, matched to the centValidated

Open submissions, 38 carried overValidated

Producer accounts & permissionsIn review

Renewal cut-overHolds until all checks pass

Illustrative migration checklist, sample data.

What this protects

The things that must not break, don't.

Connecting before replacing isn't caution for its own sake. It protects the four things a growing MGA can't afford to gamble on a systems project.

Your carrier connections keep working Keeps running

The bordereaux and workflows your capacity partners rely on keep running exactly as they do today, all the way through a phase. Nothing running in parallel touches what a carrier receives until you've approved the switch.

Your team keeps its muscle memory Keeps running

Nobody relearns their job on faith. Your team works in the current process until the new one has proven itself alongside it, so the switch is a decision they make, not a leap they're pushed into.

A phase can stop cleanly

Every phase stands on its own. If you stop after Phase 1, you keep a working system, reconciled data, and the documentation to run it, nothing half-migrated, nothing stranded between two systems.

Your data stays yours

Exportable formats, documented structures, no exit penalty, written into every agreement. The fastest way to earn trust with your data is to make leaving with it easy.

Honest boundaries

Integration depth depends on what your systems expose.

Some AMS and rater vendors publish real APIs. Some offer exports and little else. A few give us nothing to work with, and we won't pretend otherwise. Where a vendor exposes no usable interface, your Assessment says so in writing, and the design works around it honestly: scheduled file exchange, structured exports, or leaving that connection manual until the vendor gives everyone something better. What you'll never get from us is a connector that exists only on a slide.

Where a connection has to stay manual, the mundane, redundant hand-off (re-keying an export, chasing a missing field, matching a record back to its source) can run as an AI Operational Workforce with feedback loops that correct it as it goes. It changes nothing about the gate, a person still owns anything that touches rating or binding, and renewals still wait for the validation report.

Straight answers

The questions that decide a migration.

No. It's the starting condition we design for. Most growing MGAs run on an AMS plus spreadsheets that have drifted for years. The Assessment inventories what's actually there, the migration plan is built for that reality, and the validation report proves what came through before anything depends on it.

Only what the phase needs. If Phase 1 is a broker portal, we move what quoting requires and leave the rest where it lives, connected. Migrating data no phase uses adds risk and cost without adding anything you can feel, so we don't.

You take your data with you: exportable formats, documented structures, no exit penalty. It's written into every agreement. A migration you could reverse out of is the only kind worth trusting on the way in.

Go deeper

Bring the stack you actually run.

A free 60–90 minute mapping session: we sketch your systems on one page and show where a first phase would connect. No rip-and-replace, no deck, and the map is yours to keep.

Start a 30-day trial → Read about the Assessment